Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open Items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>,pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open Items
Date: 2004-11-12 17:59:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD wrote:
> I think in addition the system global name "sharemem.1" should be made more 
> pg specific, like "PostgreSQL.1". I have not done this since a new compile 
> would not detect a running old beta. But now would be the time (or never).

Change made and attached.  I assume there are other ways we detect an
active backend on Windows and that shared memory name is only one of
them.  I do think we need this fix before we put out a final release so
the next beta is the best time to do it.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: Open Items at 2004-10-18 14:57:48 from Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-11-12 18:11:59
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Previous:From: Oleg I.IvanovDate: 2004-11-12 17:39:23
Subject: Database reverse engineering

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-12 21:21:08
Subject: Win32 signals & sockets
Previous:From: Patrick B KellyDate: 2004-11-12 15:45:50
Subject: Re: multiline CSV fields

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group