| From: | Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "jessica xingzc_he" <xingzc_he(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: persistence of java objects |
| Date: | 2004-11-09 16:48:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20041109174857.0a56cfb8@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi, Jessica,
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:05:44 -0600
"jessica xingzc_he" <xingzc_he(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Does postgresql support this? if i want a column of a table for the
> persistence of instance of java objects, and use ResultSet.getObject() and
> ResultSet.updateObjecct() to access them. if so, what data type the column
> should be?
Currently, there's no support for general Java objects.
But maybe what you really need is a persistance framework. Hibernate
currently seems to be a reasonable one, and it supports PostgreSQL.
HTH,
Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schaber | 2004-11-09 16:49:00 | Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-11-09 16:48:19 | Re: driver beta release |