On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 22 October 2004 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
>>> Sent: 21 October 2004 23:32
>>> To: gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
>>> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> Subject: [pgsql-www] Problem with pgfoundry ...
>>> Just checked the news, and the new beta of pginstaller was
>>> released today ... I've just raised MaxClients to 150 from
>>> 75, so hopefully that will prevent a recurrance ...
>> Oops, sorry - did we break it? ;-)
> Do we need to start thinking of an alternative scheme for getting this
> out to people? I'd imagine the loads we see now will pale in comparason
> to the loads we see once the final release goes out.
Well, we have it on ftp, pgfoundry and bittorrent ... ftp means that all
the mirrors have it also ... are these all mentioned in the announcements?
does pgfoundry allow for an FTP url for download?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Tom Copeland||Date: 2004-10-22 14:53:20|
|Subject: Re: [Gforge-admins] Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...|
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2004-10-22 14:40:13|
|Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...|