| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with pgfoundry ... |
| Date: | 2004-10-22 13:20:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200410220920.59168.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Friday 22 October 2004 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: 21 October 2004 23:32
> > To: gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> > Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: [pgsql-www] Problem with pgfoundry ...
> >
> >
> > Just checked the news, and the new beta of pginstaller was
> > released today ... I've just raised MaxClients to 150 from
> > 75, so hopefully that will prevent a recurrance ...
>
> Oops, sorry - did we break it? ;-)
>
Do we need to start thinking of an alternative scheme for getting this out to
people? I'd imagine the loads we see now will pale in comparason to the loads
we see once the final release goes out.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2004-10-22 13:27:42 | Re: Problem with pgfoundry ... |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-10-22 07:28:46 | Re: Problem with pgfoundry ... |