Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: how much mem to give postgres?

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: POSTGRES-PERFORMANCE <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: how much mem to give postgres?
Date: 2004-10-20 18:39:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:16:18PM +0100, Matt Clark wrote:
> ><OT>
> >Hyperthreading is actually an excellent architectural feature that
> >can give significant performance gains when implemented well and used
> >for an appropriate workload under a decently HT aware OS.
> >
> >IMO, typical RDBMS streams are not an obviously appropriate workload,
> >Intel didn't implement it particularly well and I don't think there
> >are any OSes that support it particularly well.
> ></OT>
> >
> >But don't write off using it in the future, when it's been improved
> >at both the OS and the silicon levels.
> >
> > 
> >
> You are quite right of course  - unfortunately the current Intel 
> implementation meets nearly none of these criteria! 

Indeed. And when I said "no OSes support it particularly well" I meant
the x86 SMT implementation, rather than SMT in general.

As Rod pointed out, AIX seems to have decent support and Power has a
very nice implementation, and the same is probably true for at least
one other OS/architecture implementation.

> As Rod Taylor pointed out off-list, IBM's SMT implementation on the
> Power5 is vastly superior.  Though he's also just told me that Sun
> is beating IBM on price/performance for his workload, so who knows
> how reliable a chap he is... ;-)



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mark WongDate: 2004-10-20 22:05:28
Subject: Re: futex results with dbt-3
Previous:From: Matt ClarkDate: 2004-10-20 18:16:18
Subject: Re: how much mem to give postgres?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group