Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > There is only one current standard SQL:2003 correct? The rest are
> > considered deprecated?
> The old ones are certainly not "deprecated".
> Personally I find the newer versions to be suffering from uncontrolled
> feature bloat and committee-itis.
That was my feeling too. I know many cases the older specifications
Anyway, I think the new "There are three versions of the SQL standard"
wording is OK.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2004-10-18 01:10:24|
|Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-10-15 16:51:04|
|Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating |