| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore - added documentation |
| Date: | 2004-10-13 14:24:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200410131424.i9DEOr725376@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
OK, wording updated and applied. I used "process" instead of "issue".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > However, I wonder if "output database" is the proper name for -d?
> > Isn't it more "restore database" or "target database"?
>
> "restore database name" sounds like, "When this option is specified,
> only the database name is restored.". "target database" sounds a lot
> better.
>
> Your other change, "issue commands" may be interpreted incorrectly.
> When not restoring to a database, the commands are in fact "output",
> not "issued". Not sure how to make that clear, though I don't much
> like "issue" either way, because it doesn't have a precise meaning.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-10-13 14:32:31 | Re: pg_restore - added documentation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-10-13 13:49:08 | Re: pg_restore - added documentation |