| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy |
| Date: | 2004-09-30 18:06:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200409301106.36316.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Tom,
> A different semi-legitimate reason for a cutoff is that, so far as I
> know, the comp.databases.postgresql newsgroups never went through the
> formal vote process to be recognized as legitimate mainstream
> newsgroups. Back when I was a netnews administrator for CMU, it was
> common practice to refuse to carry groups that hadn't passed such a
> vote, and I imagine it still is. I haven't heard that Google is getting
> strict about this (and they sure didn't mention it in their comments)
> but if they are then we don't have much of a leg to stand on.
If that's the case, then, they should inform us and we can start a campaign.
But right now we're getting the brushoff and we need to get their attention.
BTW, how would we go about organizing a legitimacy vote? Who votes on this?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Ryan | 2004-09-30 18:15:18 | Re: New site |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-30 18:01:42 | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy |