On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:07:38PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>there is no user with ID 102 in the pg_user view. pg_restore
> >>complains about the missing user "102". And no, the user was not
> >>"102" it was the name of a (former) employee.
> >>The gross hack is to pg_restore to an ascii file and delete those
> >>GRANT lines, but the compressed dump is over 2Gb for this database.
> >Am I missing something Vivek, or should the gross hack be "creating a
> >user with id=102" ?
> And how exactly does one accomplish this? pg_users is a view so you
> can't insert into it.
CREATE USER ... WITH SYSID 102;
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Dios hizo a Adán, pero fue Eva quien lo hizo hombre.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Thomas F.O'Connell||Date: 2004-09-29 21:45:47|
|Subject: Index Analysis: Filters|
|Previous:||From: Vivek Khera||Date: 2004-09-29 21:07:38|
|Subject: Re: dangling permission on tables after drop user.|