On Tuesday August 31 2004 8:45, Ed L. wrote:
> Should the epoch snprintf format of the int64 pg_time_t timestamp be %lld
> instead of %d?
Ah, I see you handled it.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Fabien COELHO||Date: 2004-08-31 15:01:19|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE |
|Previous:||From: Ed L.||Date: 2004-08-31 14:45:18|
|Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()|