| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions |
| Date: | 2004-08-24 20:19:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20040824171846.I68447@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:
> I want to get rid of the recommendations-vacuum. I don't care if we
> don't pick the ultimately best of everything that way. If there is a
> consensus of people who use these things, repeating their recommendation
> will seldom be bad advice. Those people have proven already that they
> can make good decisions, they do use PostgreSQL after all :-)
Shouldn't some sort of automated voting system be created first? With the
ability to 'add software' and then 'vote on it'? Maybe have some sort of
login procedure such that someone could later login and change their vote?
ie something better came along ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-08-24 20:24:56 | Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions |
| Previous Message | Carlos Moreno | 2004-08-24 20:10:09 | Re: Checking whether postgresql is running |