Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions
Date: 2004-08-24 13:57:09
Message-ID: 20040824155709.C1029@hermes.hilbert.loc (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
> a) More software can make use of your good name and reputation.
That's rather dangerous, don't you think ? If PostgreSQL
proper (eg the core server) wants to keep its good name it
better make sure it is bundled with "good" "add-ons". And that
would require precisely the additional workload that several
core people have explained they must avoid in order to be able
to focus on the core engine to keep its good reputation. So,
unless people outside the core team take up the task it won't
happen. And if they do - what's the difference to the current
state of affairs ?

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: SecrétariatDate: 2004-08-24 14:06:22
Subject: Re: pg_dump/psql fails on win32 beta 8.0
Previous:From: SecrétariatDate: 2004-08-24 13:57:03
Subject: Re: Dump and Restore

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group