Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bad press

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad press
Date: 2004-08-24 12:47:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
I don't recognize them ... not someone we've dealt with ...

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Robert Treat wrote:

> Quick summary:  A company called skypak india has been using postgresql
> for a ocuple of years, but has determined it is putting too much
> pressure on their hardware infrastructure. They do claim that they spoke
> to a consulting company but that it was counter productive. The only
> details from the article regarding what kind of load they have are
> "Powered by an Intel Xeon 2.4 Ghz dual processor machine with 1GB RAM,
> the database server handles an average request load from five users, who
> fire approximately 100 queries an hour."  Which to me sounds like
> something that should be doable (depending on specifics of course).
> A quick search didn't turn up anyone from that company having posted to
> the lists for help... is anyone familiar with the company? I'd like to
> contact them to see if we could get some specifics about their problems.
> Robert Treat
> -- 
> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

  • Bad press at 2004-08-24 12:31:20 from Robert Treat

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Janning VygenDate: 2004-08-24 12:50:33
Subject: Website errors
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-08-24 12:31:20
Subject: Bad press

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group