Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions
Date: 2004-08-23 21:49:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Thomas Hallgren wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Enlarging the core committee by the amount you seem to be thinking of
>> would transform it into something quite different than it is now
>> (in particular it would be too large to make decisions effectively,
>> IMHO).
> I can relate to that. Lean and mean is good. So pehaps the core committee 
> should not be enlarged. Instead, another committee should be established for 
> this purpose that work closely together with the core committee (perhaps 
> cross staffed to some extent).

You are almost there ... now, go that one extra step and you have "a side 
project whose goal is to take the core server and bundle it with 3rd party 
apps to provide a complete RDBMS solution" ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: David WheelerDate: 2004-08-23 22:00:42
Subject: Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
Previous:From: David WheelerDate: 2004-08-23 21:47:01
Subject: Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group