Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date: 2004-08-18 15:55:21
Message-ID: 200408181755.21507.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> In the PG case a
> single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
> pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.

How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be
working on including less stuff?

> The init script is a different matter. That in principle could be
> taken from the upstream package. I'm not sure if all the Linux
> distributions could agree on a single init script, though

That can be answered with a plain and simple "no".

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 16:10:20 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-18 15:30:05 Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-08-18 16:06:05 Re: Problem analyzing performance of query
Previous Message Marcel Boscher 2004-08-18 15:42:08 Installing FullTextSearchTool tsearch2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-18 16:00:06 Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 15:46:25 Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks