Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Date: 2004-08-14 16:57:38
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:

> On 8/13/2004 12:01 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > But the fact is 'we' (PGDG) do not 'have' a replication solution; all are
> > third party, and there are some that are open source.  I personally think
> What part of the Slony-I replication system do 'we' (PGDG) not 'have'?
> The original design work got published and was up for discussion before
> the implementation work started, the entire development happened under
> the BSD license, the project was hosted on gborg from the very beginning
> and all .c, .h and .sql files in the entire tree are Copyright PGDG. The
> project lead is a PGDG Core team member and the project team consist of
> more people outside of Afilias then inside. If that isn't enough, then I
> would like to know what's left that we could announce at all?
> Please stop looking at Afilias as a 3rd party. Afilias is a member of
> the PGDG as everyone else. The problem that even people inside of this
> community can't imagine a company being just a member of this team
> doesn't mean that it is impossible.

This makes sense to me.

Dan Langille -

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2004-08-14 17:21:22
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Previous:From: Steve BergmanDate: 2004-08-14 16:56:33
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group