| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
| Date: | 2004-08-14 16:57:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20040814125726.E58862@xeon.unixathome.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 8/13/2004 12:01 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > But the fact is 'we' (PGDG) do not 'have' a replication solution; all are
> > third party, and there are some that are open source. I personally think
>
> What part of the Slony-I replication system do 'we' (PGDG) not 'have'?
>
> The original design work got published and was up for discussion before
> the implementation work started, the entire development happened under
> the BSD license, the project was hosted on gborg from the very beginning
> and all .c, .h and .sql files in the entire tree are Copyright PGDG. The
> project lead is a PGDG Core team member and the project team consist of
> more people outside of Afilias then inside. If that isn't enough, then I
> would like to know what's left that we could announce at all?
>
> Please stop looking at Afilias as a 3rd party. Afilias is a member of
> the PGDG as everyone else. The problem that even people inside of this
> community can't imagine a company being just a member of this team
> doesn't mean that it is impossible.
This makes sense to me.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-08-14 17:21:22 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
| Previous Message | Steve Bergman | 2004-08-14 16:56:33 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |