| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
| Date: | 2004-08-13 15:50:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200408131550.i7DFou121085@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >>To be fair :) the only thing that makes Slony notable for PostgreSQL is
> >>that it is Open Source. There are other replication systems out there
> >>that have been working for some time.
> >
> >
> > Uh, and we are an open source project --- Slony being "open source"
> > seems like a very notable distinction to me.
> >
>
> Thanks for pointing out what I already had :)
My point was that saying it is the "only thing" that makes it notable is
to minimize a major point of pushing Slony. It is "the" notable issue.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robby Russell | 2004-08-13 15:56:49 | Re: Is it a worthy case study? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-08-13 15:48:17 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |