Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Date: 2004-08-12 21:03:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> But this comes back to promoting some projects as being more important 
> then others, bestoying(sp?) a pseudo-official status on them ... 
> pginstaller, IMHO, makes sense since its pretty much a requirement for 
> anyone wishing to use Pg 8.0.0 on Windows ...

Yep.   That's the way the mainstream press works; they're not interested in 
technical merit of individual projects, they are interested in what's 
currently buzzword-compliant.   Replication is sexy, HA is sexy, PITR is 
sexy, high performance is sexy, enterprise Java is sexy.   A lot of other 
features and add-ons which are very valuable to the community are not 
interesting to the general press.  For the Press Release, which is designed 
to go to reporters, we need to pack it densly with stuff that's going to 
appeal to them.

> If replication for PostgreSQL was something newly available, then not a 
> big deal, but it isn't even something that is new, nor has been for over a 
> year now ...

And as you recall, we mentioned eRServer repeatedly; there was an eRServer 
press release, followed by mentions in the next 2 general PostgreSQL 

-Josh Berkus
 "A developer of Very Little Brain"
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-08-12 21:49:08
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Previous:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2004-08-12 20:56:07
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group