Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: surrogate key or not?

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: surrogate key or not?
Date: 2004-07-28 12:04:02
Message-ID: 20040728140402.A607@hermes.hilbert.loc (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-sql
> retrievable. I imagine a system whereby you define keywords and attributes
> for them (attributes would be an episode date, or dosage, etc).
This is pretty much exactly what we are working on. We are
factoring out data into dedicated tables where that is
possible due to the structured nature of the data and store
the remaining narrative as TEXT with associated attributes of
all kinds.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Karsten HilbertDate: 2004-07-28 12:08:11
Subject: Re: surrogate key or not?
Previous:From: Kenneth GonsalvesDate: 2004-07-28 02:14:50
Subject: Re: surrogate key or not?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group