Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: win32 version info

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: win32 version info
Date: 2004-07-27 12:55:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Claudio Natoli wrote:
> > Seems inconsistent to me.
> There is no inconsistency, as the two requirements are aimed at very
> different "issues". It was just the case that one (win32 versioning) was
> inadvertently a potential (and rejected) solution to the other (auto version
> check).
> The question now is simply whether or not this versioning cruft justifies
> its existence, presumably for facilitating packaging and installation of
> binaries (particularly those that cannot report their version readily, such
> as DLLs). I personally certainly have no use for it, and I don't see us
> getting the "Designed for Microsoft Windows" tick any time soon, but I have
> no doubt that Magnus, in working on the win32 installer, is perhaps seeing
> the need in an entirely different light.

"Designed for Microsoft Windows"  :-)

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2004-07-27 13:16:04
Subject: logger subprocess
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2004-07-27 06:16:47
Subject: casting strings to multidimensional arrays yields strange results

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group