Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Kramer <josh(at)bitbuckets(dot)com>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?
Date: 2004-07-12 21:24:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>> Can anyone provide details on this?  Were the servers misconfigured?  I've 
>> run into situations where the postgres server will stop responding if the 
>> disk fills to capacity.  We should prepare something to respond to this.
> They were running 7.1 at the time. I doubt this would be a problem now.

If it was a problem then, they didn't let anyone know about it ... to the 
best of my knowledge, the move to IBM/DB2 was an infusion of cash (ie. 
bribe) from IBM, it wasn't anything technical ... but, again, I'd never 
heard of any technical problems with the servers *shrug*

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Roderick A. AndersonDate: 2004-07-12 21:27:48
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-07-12 21:21:31
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group