Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004
Date: 2004-06-01 16:57:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Just so that everyone is aware, we are going to push the freeze date for 
>> 7.5 to July 1st.
>> Although we feel that there are enough improvements and features already 
>> in place for 7.5, Tom's felt that if we gave it that extra month, we could 
>> also have PITR in place for 7.5 ...
>> If anyone is working on other features that they feel can be polished off 
>> before the July 1st deadline, we would be most happy to incorporate those 
>> as well, but do recommend submitting patches for review *sooner*, rather 
>> then later, so that any recommended corrections can be addressed before 
>> teh deadline.
> I welcome this, as I always thought June 1 was too soon. However, I think 
> that the process by which the date was eventually arrived at was unfortunate.
> I would modestly suggest that there should be a minimum period of notice of a 
> feature freeze - 6 weeks or 2 months seems about right to me, given the

Oh, you mean the original freeze date that was set at the start of the dev 
cycle 6 months ago?

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-06-01 17:21:17
Subject: Re: Fast index build vs. PITR
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-06-01 16:52:32
Subject: Re: Fast index build vs. PITR

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group