Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2004 21:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> writes:
> > > I was toying around with idea of converting all the memory related
> > > parameters in postgresql.conf to kilobytes for simplicity and
> > > uniformity.
> > Why is that a good idea?
> Right now following are measured in pages
> Following are in kbs
> while rest of the memory parameters are in kb. I thought being uniform would
> be good. Besides it will make it independent of page size as well.
Sounds good to me. How are you handling cases where the value has to be
a multiple of page size --- rounding or throwing an error?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2004-05-31 13:12:10|
|Subject: Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review|
|Previous:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2004-05-31 13:01:39|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump --comment?|