| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
| Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Distributions which contain postgresql |
| Date: | 2004-05-03 23:06:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20040503200515.L22860@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2004, elein wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for a semi-definitive list of
> > os distributions which contain postgresql
> > by default.
> >
> > RedHat, SuSE, Debian and cygwin all seem to have
> > it. Does anyone know of others, if any?
>
> As a matter of interest, why are you interested only in operating systems
> which install PostgreSQL by default. To me, installing it by
> default, without giving the use a choice, is a bad thing.
Agreed ... FreeBSD ships with it, but its an optional install ...
What I'd be curious about is for those that actually install PostgreSQL,
do they actually *require* it for some reason, or do they just install it
so that more disk space is used up? :)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2004-05-03 23:12:52 | Re: Distributions which contain postgresql |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-03 23:05:15 | Re: Distributions which contain postgresql |