| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-04-30 05:11:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200404300511.i3U5BCI12959@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > But we don't want to have all our developers controlled by one feature
> > being completed. It isn't fair. They should get a good warning about
> > freeze starting.
>
> Nor is it fair to extend the development cycle indefinitely waiting for
> that one feature in the first place ... there is *nothing* that states
> that the 7.6 dev cycle is nice and short for a change ...
Agreed. I say we wait for _a_ major feature completed, or X major
features.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-30 05:27:10 | Re: FW: Timezone library |
| Previous Message | zhuangjifeng | 2004-04-30 04:59:09 | How does postgres remain the unique index unique? |