Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development),pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-interfaces)
Subject: Re: Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-10 00:22:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> there two of them there now?

There are indeed two - mine and the other one:
     Version 1.5.0 released 2004-02-29 (source, manual, and Windows binary
     Last release was beta 1.4b3 2002-11-15?

If you delete libpgtcl from "core" CVS, you lose the histories. I don't
think you want that. But that doesn't mean you necessarily have to bundle
it with the release anymore, does it? It's up to you core team people what
you want to do about unbundling libpgtcl. I've done my part. But I do have
a suggestion: if you chose to unbundled it and pgtclng becomes the
"official" Tcl interface, someone from the core team needs to be added to
the admin list of the gborg pgtclng project. You know, just in case...

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: pgsqlDate: 2004-04-10 02:43:15
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL configuration
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-04-09 22:09:52
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL configuration

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-04-10 13:53:29
Subject: Re: pl/perl features
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-09 17:39:17
Subject: Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group