Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Date: 2004-03-09 20:03:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www

> Did I miss a thread? I can't find anything about a pgFoundry in my
> archives. I assume it's Gforge based?

Yes.   It's the whole GForge discussion on Hackers.

Hmmmm ... let me apologize for not directly addressing this list about the 
"final plans" for GForge/pgFoundry, and try to remedy the situation now.    I 
spent so much time discussing this on Hackers that I failed to notice that 
this list got cut off the CC before we reached a conclusion.

Marc, Chris Ryan, Andrew D. and the Core *have* been in the loop on this.

We've set up a new host,   This will hold our GForge 
installation, to which we will be migrating GBorg projects as their owners 
are ready to do so.   We've already stopped accepting new GBorg projects. 
Migration is painless and almost 100% automatic.

Within 1.5 weeks we should be offficially launching pgFoundry.   Among other 
things, at that time we'll be launching  a contest to "re-theme" the foundry.   
When portal is done, we can also discuss using some of the headers and 
includes from portal to support site integration.

Anything else you need to know?

-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Gavin M. RoyDate: 2004-03-09 20:20:42
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Previous:From: Alexey BorzovDate: 2004-03-09 19:22:32
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-09 20:08:28
Subject: Re: psqlscan.l
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-03-09 19:47:34
Subject: Re: psqlscan.l

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group