| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Luiz Guilherme Freitas de Paula" <luiz(at)auge(dot)com(dot)br>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in Cluster |
| Date: | 2004-02-27 20:33:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200402272033.00849.dev@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday 27 February 2004 20:13, Luiz Guilherme Freitas de Paula wrote:
> Is there any way to use PostgreSQL in a cluster configuration or have
> redundancy?
Well, you don't say much about your hardware, usage patterns etc. but you
might want look at the various replication options currently available.
There's one in the source distribution: contrib/dbmirror.
Or perhaps erserver/rservimp on gborg.postgresql.org
> How can I have my DB to not stop on hardware failure?
I don't know of anyone doing instant fail-over to a secondary machine. You
might want to consider the following:
1. External, shared RAID drives (note that you *MUST NOT* run two versions of
PG against the same files)
2. Duplicate machines with replication and one of the "heartbeat+failover"
options (free or commercial)
3. Commercial high-availability hardware (I know - too expensive)
Can't say much more without knowing what you want. Whatever path you decide to
take, do a proper risk assessment first and allow time to understand the
systems involved and too proper testing.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2004-02-27 20:38:21 | Re: PostgreSQL in Cluster |
| Previous Message | Luiz Guilherme Freitas de Paula | 2004-02-27 20:13:57 | Re: PostgreSQL in Cluster |