| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-02-26 22:52:49 |
| Message-ID: | 200402261452.49385.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
People,
The question is, do we need BZ right off or should we try GForge's lightweight
tool first? Personally I find that BZ is a little intimidating to new
users, particularly for searching on issues; as a result it tends to lead to
a lot of duplicate filings.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 22:56:45 | Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 22:56:45 | Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 22:56:45 | Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 22:56:45 | Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-26 22:49:33 | Re: Upgraded Site..any news ? |