Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
> 2. Select Pl/Java_remote
> 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
> 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
> (controversial? Nah :-) )
Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ. This is likely to be the fastest
and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Hallgren||Date: 2004-02-23 17:32:39|
|Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?|
|Previous:||From: Shridhar Daithankar||Date: 2004-02-23 15:57:40|
|Subject: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it required?|