Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature
Date: 2004-02-12 20:38:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Attached is a corrected version that solves the query cancel problem by 
> not napping any more and going full speed as soon as any signal is 
> pending. If nobody objects, I'm going to commit this tomorrow.

Jan, three questions.  First, is this useful now that we have the new
cache replacement code, second, do we need this many parameters (can't
any of them be autotuned), and third, what about documentation?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: scott.marloweDate: 2004-02-12 20:42:01
Subject: Re: RFC: Query Planner making a distinction between Cross
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2004-02-12 20:22:28
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-12 23:52:08
Subject: Re: ANALYZE patch for review
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-12 20:30:46
Subject: Re: Updated win32 readdir patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group