On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > now if they only had PostgreSQL on the list, it would be worth rallying
> > about ...
> It is on the list. Look again. We're there as Postgres.
You'd think that, of all ppl. O'Reilly would know the correct spelling ...
but, then again, you'd like that the advocacy group would try and correct
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2004-02-09 05:00:01|
|Subject: First rule of advocacy ... I think ...|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Browne||Date: 2004-02-08 20:21:36|
|Subject: Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: David Garamond||Date: 2004-02-09 05:06:41|
|Subject: disallowing multiple NULLs in a unique constraint|
|Previous:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2004-02-09 04:18:30|
|Subject: Re: fsync = true beneficial on ext3?|