Re: Postgresql.org search engine.

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql.org search engine.
Date: 2004-01-31 05:48:08
Message-ID: 20040131014522.O29077@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

> Hmm,
> what's about
>
> <meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow">

k, that would be for the index/thread pages, of course ... right?

here's a question, since you have more experience with this then I ... teh
current meta tags set for the message pages themselves are:

<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="all">
<META NAME="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="TRUE">
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="keywords" content="postgresql, hackers, general, sql, admin, novice, interfaces, odbc, jdbc">
<META NAME="rating" Content="General" >
<META NAME="distribution" Content="Global" >
<META NAME="revisit-after" Content="7 days" >
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="follow, index, noarchive">

anything wrong with the above? seems okay to me, just making sure that
maybe there isn't something else that I should add?

>
> Oleg
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su]
> > > > Sent: 30 January 2004 20:01
> > > > To: Dave Page
> > > > Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Postgresql.org search engine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why not have fully dynamic pages for mailing lists ? Proper
> > > > configured server with cacheing could be very fast.
> > >
> > > Dunno, the lists and archives are traditionally Marc's domain :-) The
> > > changes I'd like to see do involve stripping out the individual messages
> > > to the absolute bare minimum of content.
> >
> > 'k, this is how the search engines should see each message when they
> > index:
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-01/msg00745t.php
> >
> > anything else you'd like me to strip out of there? :(
> >
> > Note that this is not with the <!--noindex--> stuff you were talking
> > about, which, from what you've said, I'm not sure is useful, since not all
> > search engines will recognize it ... with the way its coded now, as long
> > as I have the search engine listed, the output will look the same ...
> >
> > ----
> > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> > Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
> >
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-01-31 05:49:09 Re: Postgresql.org search engine.
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-01-31 05:47:34 Re: Postgresql.org search engine.