Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Function call

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function call
Date: 2004-01-27 17:09:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> Thinking more about it, I'm not sure if it really is an important
> addition at all. I've got a number of requests for the feature. so
> there are people that want it, that much I know.

I like it very much, and I think mostly everyone else does, too.  It's 
just a question of what syntax to use.  Personally, I would be OK with 
"=>".  The SQL standard already attaches a special meaning to "->" 
(object dereference, like in C), so I'd just avoid all "arrows" as 
operator names.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: ohpDate: 2004-01-27 17:11:20
Subject: Re: Most urgent
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-01-27 17:02:04
Subject: Re: Most urgent

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group