Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql on software RAID

From: Mitchell Laks <mlaks(at)bellatlantic(dot)net>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql on software RAID
Date: 2003-12-18 05:46:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
Dear Experts,

For what its worth : I have been running a postgresql database on a hardware 
raid 5 (adaptec 2400A hardware card and 4 x 200GB WD IDE drives) for about 
6months and in my (relatively low volume read write by transaction standards 
described by others here) environment all has been smooth. 

MItchell Laks

>On Thursday 18 December 2003 12:13 am, you wrote:
> When grilled further on (Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:45:43 -0700 (MST)),
> "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> confessed:
> > Just wondering, was that on hardware or software RAID5, and if hardware
> > did it have battery backed cache controllers?  Makes a huge difference. 
> > I would never use SW RAID5 for heavily written databases.
> Hardware raid on Sun Ultra 4 and Ultra 250.  I do not know what type of
> controller, or if it's battery backed.  It's up in the data center, and
> I've never even seen them...
> cheers,
> rob

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Neil ZanellaDate: 2003-12-18 06:23:57
Subject: PostgreSQL: query optimizer: viewing query plans
Previous:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2003-12-18 05:39:06
Subject: Re: Postgresql on software RAID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group