Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: fork/exec patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: "'Neil Conway '" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,"''pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org' '" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch
Date: 2003-12-17 00:11:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Claudio Natoli wrote:
> > (circa line 335 of ipc/shmem.c:)
> > [snip]
> > Doesn't this function still acquire ShmemIndexLock? (i.e. why was this
> comment changed?)
> AFAICS this is just whitespace differences.
> With the exception of that missing "break" (Bruce, I guess it goes without
> saying, but could you please remove that line from the patch before
> applying... and again "Thank you Neil"), these are stylistic/cosmetic and
> effect the EXEC_BACKEND code only.
> Would a follow-up patch to correct these, along with the next step of the
> fork/exec changes, be acceptable?

Claudio, let's go for a new version of the patch so everyone can see
that is being applied.  Thanks.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-17 00:12:29
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch
Previous:From: Jon JensenDate: 2003-12-16 20:18:34
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Double Backslash example patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group