Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: minor cleanup in plpgsql.sgml

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: minor cleanup in plpgsql.sgml
Date: 2003-11-30 05:36:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> > Funny. That's a good argument for doing it that way, but almost the same
> > argument I make for putting the INTO at the end: so as to not confuse
> > people with the "SELECT a,b,c INTO newtable FROM oldtable" sql syntax.
> > In either case ISTM the existing recommendation is flawed. 
> Come to think of it, I think that the motivation for the existing
> recommendation was precisely to have a syntax that is visibly different
> from the SQL-level SELECT INTO, with an eye to eventually allowing the
> SQL construct to work too.  This may not be very important though,
> considering that SELECT INTO is deprecated in favor of CREATE TABLE AS.

I have removed the recommentation:

     The <literal>INTO</> clause can appear almost anywhere in the <command>SELECT</command>

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-30 06:10:03
Subject: Re: PG_VERSION in pg_config.h.win32
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-11-30 05:08:53
Subject: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable (was: [GENERAL] SELECT Question)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group