On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
> >>but doesn't that mean that
> >>psql would be separate as well?
> >"no new client applications"
> BTW, Joshua, thanks for releasing this - all my client side work is
> currently Java (a Tomcat webapp in fact) so I'm very interested to see
> the shape of your app, as I'm sure others are.
D'oh, just clued into the 'java' aspect ... Joshua, will this run as a
JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of pgAdmin,
as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely ... if
you could run pgManage under something like Jakarta-Tomcat as a JSP, that
would be *really* cool ...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-11-04 21:01:33|
|Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage |
|Previous:||From: scott.marlowe||Date: 2003-11-04 20:41:30|
|Subject: Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM |