Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum thoughts

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>,"pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum thoughts
Date: 2003-11-01 05:16:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 15:31, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Well, "partial solution" isn't quite what I would call it, and it surely 
> > needs integration with sequential scans. I really do expect the whole 
> > hack to fall apart if some concurrent seqscans are going on
> I'd rather see us implement a buffer replacement policy that considers
> both frequency + recency (unlike LRU, which considers only recency).
> Ideally, that would work "automagically". I'm hoping to get a chance to
> implement ARC[1] during the 7.5 cycle.

Someone just started working on it this week.  He emailed Jan and I.  He
hopes to have a patch in a few days.  I will make sure he posts to

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-01 05:19:22
Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-01 04:51:57
Subject: Re: Problems with whitespace-ignoring diff options

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group