Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Press Release

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>,Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Press Release
Date: 2003-10-30 00:58:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> I knew that it would delay the need for a vacuum full but I didn't know 
> it could
> potentially eliminate it. O.k.

Sure.   I've got one project where the client hasn't had a VACUUM FULL in 1.5 
years.  REINDEX, on the other hand ....

Of course, this doesn't work for all databases.   DBs that involve huge data 
transformations would require preposterously high FSM settings.  

-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-10-30 01:02:02
Subject: Re: Press Release
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2003-10-30 00:57:14
Subject: Re: Press Release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group