| From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jpargudo(at)free(dot)fr>, Vincent Harcq <vha(at)audaxis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types |
| Date: | 2003-10-20 13:55:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200310201555.54057.jm@poure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Le Lundi 20 Octobre 2003 14:52, Robert Treat a écrit :
> by "community" do you means users or developers? there are certainly
> enough users interested in a postgresql version that i think it would be
> viable to fork it if the compiere developers aren't willing to
> cooperate. certainly would be more work, but if you could get a stable
> version I think it could be successful.
Dear Robert,
At first, the project has limited goals: porting Compiere PL server-side code
to PLpgSQL, removing some non-SQL 99 stuff and submitting the code back and
convincing Compiere developer community to use PostgreSQL.
Then, we will see. The problem with forking is that you have to create a
developer community from scratch, which is highly difficult and most of times
impossible.
Best regards,
Jean-Michel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2003-10-20 14:53:07 | Forbes article on "GPL hit men" mentions PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-20 12:52:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-10-20 14:34:49 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-20 13:36:05 | Re: Vacuum thoughts |