| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Disabling function validation |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 23:17:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200310062317.h96NHMC23076@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I think we should change the "check_function_bodies" to something more
> > general. I like "restore_validation_mode" because it could also be used
> > to disable foreign key checks which we are discussing.
>
> I think I'd prefer to keep foreign key check disabling separate. Or at
> least make it separately selectable. Maybe validation_mode could have
> multiple levels ("off", "safe", "risky")?
Makes sense. Function bodies will be validated anyway when they are
run, while foreign keys would not. Shame we can't disable fsync per
backend.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-10-07 05:46:56 | pgsql-server/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog com ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-06 23:13:30 | Re: Disabling function validation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-06 23:18:16 | Re: new initdb.c available |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-06 23:13:30 | Re: Disabling function validation |