On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to
> cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8 src/interfaces/ecpg/include/datetime.h
> I have dtime_t defined in my sys/types.h. The old version of datetime.h used
Argh, didn't know that some systems have this datatype.
> #define dtime_t timestamp, the new one uses a typedef. Is there actually
> a reason to keep dtime_t, or would just performing the #define, i.e.,
> the following patch be sufficient? It allows me to compile and install
> postgres.. (I don't use ecpg, so I really can't say..)
For ecpg it does not matter which name you use. The typedef is there for
only one reason, namely that Informix uses dtime_t and to be compatible
we have to define that type as well.
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2003-09-29 18:08:01|
|Subject: Re: ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)|
|Previous:||From: Lamar Owen||Date: 2003-09-29 17:59:09|
|Subject: Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum|