Re: Tuning/performance question.

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tuning/performance question.
Date: 2003-09-28 10:09:56
Message-ID: 200309281539.56558.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Sunday 28 September 2003 09:19, David Griffiths wrote:
> No difference. Note that all the keys that are used in the joins are
> numeric(10)'s, so there shouldn't be any cast-issues.

Can you make them bigint and see? It might make some difference perhaps.

Checking the plan in the meantime.. BTW what tuning you did to postgresql?

Check http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html, assuming
you haven't seen earlier..

HTH

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Marzen 2003-09-28 11:13:54 Re: Tuning/performance question.
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-09-28 10:08:36 C/C++/Java [was Re: State of Beta 2]

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Marzen 2003-09-28 11:13:54 Re: Tuning/performance question.
Previous Message David Griffiths 2003-09-28 03:49:23 Tuning/performance question.