Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 'Official' Interfaces

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'Official' Interfaces
Date: 2003-09-28 00:38:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Dave Page wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> It's been brought to my attention that there is no mechanism in place to
> allow people to recognise the best or 'official' PostgreSQL interfaces,
> and I don't just mean those in the core distribution, but those that we
> consider the best of their type such a psqlODBC, libpqxx, Npgsql and so
> on.
> Obviously we can list them on a webpage, but what criteria could we use
> to select them?

I talked to the JDBC guys about this already.  What we need is a section
in the documentation about the various interfaces that are not
distributed with PostgreSQL, where to find them, and how they differ,
e.g. how are the perl interfaces and c++ interfaces different.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-09-28 23:39:25
Subject: Re: p3p Policy problems
Previous:From: World Wide Web OwnerDate: 2003-09-27 19:24:17
Subject: New News Entry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group