Re: Linux2.6 overcommit behaviour

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Linux2.6 overcommit behaviour
Date: 2003-09-01 01:30:52
Message-ID: 200309010130.h811UqV24211@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I believe that the swap slot can be subsequently freed, though. In
> theory your available virtual memory should be (almost) RAM+swap. In
> practice, Linux can run too close to that limit, (or way over it if you
> turn the checks off). But restricting the maximum possible pages to
> RAM/2 + swap should normally be fine. IANAKH, though.
>
> Also note that the truly bad thing about the OOM killer is that it can
> affect a process that is not making any new memory demands at all.

How does the OOM killer kill processes, kill -9 or kill -1 and wait?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-01 01:51:02 Re: pg_dump bug?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-01 01:29:40 Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version