| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
| Date: | 2003-08-30 04:49:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200308300449.h7U4nBP25849@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
> > thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
> > such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way.
>
> Long shot ... is there some way of writing a configure test for this?
> Right now, it sounds like we're going to be hitting alot of trial-n-error
> if there isn't ...
How would we test if a function is thread-safe? I can't think of a
reliable way, and hence my warning that this adjusting could take a
while.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-30 04:51:01 | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-08-30 04:34:37 | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |