Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?
Date: 2003-07-30 21:33:35
Message-ID: 20030730213335.GD34647@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > Um, why not make it an actual full blown security feature by
> > applying the following patch? This gives PostgreSQL real read
> > only transactions that users can't escape from. Notes about the
> > patch:
>
> Way nifty.
>
> I vote in favor of this patch (suitably documented & debugged) for 7.5.

Heh, there ain't much to debug: it's pretty straight forward. I ran
all the use cases/syntaxes I could think of and they worked as
expected. It's a pretty chump little ditty that I originally wrote
for the sake of the 7.4 PR, but it's proving to be quite useful here
in my tree... though I like the name "jail_read_only_transactions"
more... patch updated for new name.

-sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-30 21:40:05 Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-30 21:10:26 Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-30 21:40:05 Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-30 21:10:26 Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-30 21:40:05 Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-30 21:10:26 Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions?