Re: benchmarks

From: Richard Schilling <rschilling(at)nationalinformatics(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmarks
Date: 2003-07-26 18:02:47
Message-ID: 20030726180247.GG50691@foghorn.rsmba.biz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

I would suggest doing the same benchmarks that are used by PC Computing
or other "pop-trade" magazines that do such comparisons. In fact your
tests should mirror as cloesly as possible to tests done by the
magazines. Don't worry about having mentioned names. Being
transparent is important with benchmarks.

Richard Schilling

On 2003.07.25 11:24 elein wrote:
> I have someone willing to do a canned
> benchmark on HP/ux involving Sybase,
> Oracle and PostgreSQL and publish
> the results here. Names or no-names.
> But the benchmarks should be fairly
> well pre-canned. For example, the
> postgresql.conf should probably not
> be out of the box.
>
> Who/what can I point him to? I do not
> follow benchmarks.
>
> elein
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-26 21:04:31 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #4
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2003-07-26 14:32:56 Re: benchmarks