Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...
Date: 2003-04-27 08:35:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Ah, I had this backwards: I thought SECURITY DEFINER wasn't
> > setting something that'd allow the foreign keys to run as the
> > owner of the function.
> Nah; by the time the RI triggers run, you're out of the function
> entirely.  So they have to fend for themselves.
> Here's the 7.3 version of the patch (it's a bit ugly because I had
> to back-port a couple of changes that are in CVS tip).

Ah, excellent!  Thank you Tom.  This patch works wonderfully for me!
It doesn't apply cleanly to 7.2, but here's the diff in case anyone's
interested (applies to postgresql7 and postgresql-devel, just drop it
into files/ and recompile):


Sean Chittenden

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2003-04-27 10:08:07
Subject: Re: current breakage with PGCLIENTENCODING
Previous:From: Joachim WielandDate: 2003-04-27 07:46:17
Subject: Re: STABLE functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group